Intentional walk rules to change

MLB has made a formal proposal to the players' union to change the intentional walk rules to not require pitches to be thrown. A good article popped up recently on Fangraphs about this, which echoes a similar article I wrote last season when the idea was first floated. My previous article is reproduced below.

From May 24, 2016:

It was reported recently that, starting in the 2017 season, intentional walks will no longer require four pitches to be thrown and the batter will simply be awarded first base. It’s almost certain that this has to do with MLB’s recent gush of changes to try to improve pace of play (despite the fact that recently-instututed replay reviews take much longer than they should and are generally awful and boring).

This is, for me, irrationally upsetting. From 2000-2015, there were 19,637 intentional walks issued. With 2,430 MLB games each season, this means there are 0.51 intentional walks per game. I’m not sure where to find information on the pace of pitches during intentional walks specifically, but I pulled some data from this article from 2010 on pitch times in general. If you assume each team threw the same number of pitches during the course of the season in question, you come out to an average time of 20.8 seconds per pitch. This means that an intentional walk of four pitches takes just over a minute (62.4 seconds, on average) from the first pitch to the last pitch. With some rounding, this means the new intentional walk rule is saving, on average, 30 seconds per game, which is a pittance compared with the total time a game takes and how much time is wasted on other trivial things.

These rough calculations show that the amount of time that is wasted on intentional walk pitches on a per game basis is less than the amount of time it takes to tie your shoes in the morning. At this point, you might be inclined to ask “who cares?” A small amount of time is a small amount of time, wasted or saved. However, I’d like to point out two positives to the current system under which intentional walks are completed.

The first is that the nature of an intentional walk is that you’re putting a guy on base for free because you would rather pitch to someone else than the guy you’re walking. This almost always happens in a tense situation in the game. This doesn’t happen very often if there are no runners on base, the opposite of a tense situation. In fact, since 1913, only 152 batters have been walked intentionally with no one on base.

[Sidebar: An incredible 41 of those 152 (27%) were Barry Bonds, including 19 in 2004.]

[Sidebar 2: The most recent person to have this happen to them was Andrew McCutchen last year, in the 11th inning of the first walkoff win against the Cards prior to the All-Star break. There were two outs, and McCutchen was only walked to force Pirates’ pitcher Deolis Guerra to bat, who promptly grounded into a forceout at second base. Here’s the video of Cutch’s walkoff homer later in the game, just because it was awesome.]

Random musings aside, the intentional walk with nobody on has happened, on average, barely more than once per year in the last hundred or so years. Therefore, the situation calling for an intentional walk almost always has some tension connected to it, and tension in baseball is exciting. Why, then, would that be the one minute you eliminate from the game? It would make more sense to eliminate boring minutes, like pandering to American nationalism during the seventh inning stretch by playing God Bless America or allowing challenges prior to the late innings of baseball games.

Furthermore, the rate of intentional walks is decreasing in recent years, which is probably both a product of the end of the steroid era in baseball and changes in thinking about putting guys on base related to sabermetrics. This makes this even less important for baseball to eliminate because it's happening even less often.

The second reason that intentional walks pitches should be retained is that there’s the really rare chance that the pitcher or catcher will screw up. The inadvertent nature of such foibles provides great joy or consternation for those watching, depending on whether your team is the addressee or addressor of such unintended missives. For example, Jason Kipnis scored just last season on a wild pitch during an intentional walk. It would appear at first glance that plays of this sort should be eliminated by the time players reach puberty, but everyone makes mistakes and the very best baseballers in the entire world are no different!

With the elimination of the intentional walk pitches, you won’t ever see something like Miguel Cabrera getting a hit to drive in the go-ahead run:

And if your Google-fu is good enough to find cat memes, you can find this clip from a game between the Lancaster Barnstormers and the Somerset Patriots in the independent Atlantic League, in which the Patriots win on a walkoff wild pitch during an intentional walk attempt in the 12th inning:

While these plays are few and far between, weird things happening that aren’t supposed to happen is one of the things that makes baseball really exciting. While this rule change is admittedly not a big deal, it’s a small, small part of the homogenization of baseball that is taking away some of the quirks and excitement from the game.

Stats in this article on intentional walks all came from

Pirates beat the Mariners and move on to Milwaukee

I'm writing this from my phone so this will be short, without frills. The Pirates got a much needed win against the Mariners yesterday. The defense was spectacular. If you didn't watch the game, do yourself a favor and watch all the defensive highlights. While you're at it, watch the offensive highlights too. Cutch got it going with a good game, Kang was better than he's been, and the Pirates erupted for ten runs.

Read More

Cardinals series wrapup and what the future holds

This is going to be a quick one because I have to pack since I’m heading out to Pittsburgh for the weekend to catch the last two games before the All-Star break.

The winning streak is over, but it put the Pirates right back in the thick of things in the playoff race. This is exactly what they needed at this point in the season to help identify where their season is going; they still have a really great shot at the playoffs, even if it is just the Wild Card Game, and that’s a coin toss worth playing for.

Read More

Pirates 6 Giants 7: The one where the Pirates blow a 6-1 lead. Or, wrestling night.

There was a point when the Pirates were up 6-1 early on that I was going to text my friend, who’s a Giants fan, gloating over their significant improvement on yesterday’s affair. Something stopped me, though, and as the game wore on, the Giants chipped away and chipped away until a dropped Polanco catch down the left field line resulted in the 7-6 Giants lead that was the final score.

Read More

Just please do something

(I started writing this when the Pirates were tied with the Giants 0-0 today. By the time I finished, it was 10-0 and the game was about as winnable as that carnival game where you throw the baseball at the milk jugs. So it goes.)

Despite the feeling of the last few weeks, the Pirates are very much alive in the “playoff” race. Only 3.0 games back from the second Wild Card, this laggard crew could still find themselves in a playoff game, albeit one against Clayton Kershaw or Noah Syndergaard or Jose Fernandez. If last night’s contest is any indication, however, that single game is worth pursuing as a goal; anyone can win on any night if Jeff Locke can beat Madison Bumgarner in a pitcher’s duel in which Eric Kratz’s weak solo homer was the only scoring play of the game. Just when we thought we were finally going to be rid of Jeff Locke, he comes crawling back with a start that stays his execution from the rotation for another two weeks.

Read More

Pirates 4 Cubs Much more than 4: The Pirates suck right now

The bullpen is filled with random dudes who either suck or I’ve never heard of or both. The starting rotation currently includes four pitchers who can’t pitch well and one guy who’s started 3 MLB games, two of them against a Mets lineup that’s arguably worse than the Pirates’ pitching staff right now. It seems like the “scrap heap pitcher experiment” is over because it hasn’t worked out at all for the Pirates. If these guys want to be contenders moving forward, they have some decisions to make. The prospects need to be put to work somehow, either through trades to get legitimate players (either now or during the offseason) or promoted to the Majors to get some big league experience to prepare them for future seasons.

Read More